ABSTRACT
Every time the economy recesses the role of government intervention as proposed by Keynes again reiterates. However the nature and magnitude of these policies are important to note. It is on this premise that this study examines the impact of oil revenue fluctuations and fiscal policy response on economic growth in Nigeria. The study used data from the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Annual Reports and Statistical Bulletin, the World Bank Indicators and National Bureau of Statistics. The data was analysed with the aid of multiple regression analysis and Garch model of analysis .The results suggest that Gross fixed capital formation, labour, foreign direct investment, Gross national expenditure and fuel subsidy were significant determinants of GDP. While: inflation, corruption perception index, and the excess crude dummy were not significant determinants of GDP. However, while corruption perception index and excess crude dummy were negatively related to GDP, the rest of the variables displayed a positive relationship with GDP. The study also shows that oil revenue fluctuations significantly and positively impacts on GDP in Nigeria. The study therefore recommends that excess crude account and fuel subsidy should be consciously reinstated for it to perform at full capacity and significantly affect economic growth in a positive sense.
TABLE OF CONTENT
Cover Page…………………………………………………………………………..…………….i
Title page…………………………………………………………………………….……………ii
Certification Page …………………………………………………………………….………….iii
Approval Page…………………………………………………………………………. …………iv
Dedication …………………………………………………………………………….………….v
Acknowledgements …………………………………………………………………….…………vi
Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………………..vii
Table of Content ….………………………………………………………………………………viii
List of Tables …………………………………………………………………………..…………xi
List of figures…………………….……………………………………………………..…………xi
Appendix…………………….……………………………………………………..…………..….xi
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION
Background to the Study…………………………………………………………………………..1
Statement of the Problem…………………………………………………….4
Research questions……………………………………………..6
Objectives of the Study………………………………………………………….6
Statement of Hypotheses…….…………………………………….6
Significance of the Study…………………………………………………….6
Scope of the Study …….………………………………………………………………………….7
Limitations of the Study…….………………………………….7
Organization of the Study …………………………………………7
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW
Conceptual Framework……………………….……………………..8
Conceptualization of Fiscal Policy ………………………….……………8
The Concept of Excess Crude Account……………………………..9
The Concept of Fuel Subsidy…………………………………10
Theoretical Literature…………………………………………….11
The Harrod Domar Model ……………….……………………11
Solow’s Neo-classical Theory.…………………………….…….13
Wagner’s Law…………………………………………………………………………………….17
The Permanent Oil Income Model…………………………………18
The Benchmark Model……………………………………………21
Theories on Fuel Subsidy…………………………………22
Federal Government Oil Revenue Management in Nigeria….……………..23
Background of Oil Prices in Nigeria since Oil discovery………………..25
Empirical Literature……………………………………………………26
Global Evidence …………………………………………………………..……………………..26
Nigeria Evidence …………………………………………………………..…………………….30
Limitations of Previous study…………………………………………36
CHAPTER THREE: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………37
Fiscal Policy Response and Economic Growth in Nigeria: …………37
Theoretical Framework……………………………………………………..37
Model Specification………………………………………………………………………………38
Theoretical Framework for Garch model ………………..39
Model Specification for Garch…………………………………39
Estimation Procedure……………………………………………..40
Nature and Sources of Data………………………………………….43
Software Package………………………………………………………………………………..43
CHAPTER FOUR: EMPIRICAL RESULTS
Stationarity and Co-integration test: .……………………………..44
Stationarity test.…………….……………………………………………………………………44
Co-integration test for Ordinary Least Square Results…………………45
The Impact of Excess Crude Account and Fuel Subsidy on Economic Growth..………..……..46
Impact of Oil Revenue Fluctuations on Economic Growth in Nigeria………….50
Evaluation of Hypotheses…………………………………………….51
CHAPTER FIVE: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Summary of Finding…………………..…………………………………52
Policy Implications..……………………….……………………………………………………53
Recommendations……………………………………………………………………………54
Suggestion for further Research………..…………………………..54
Conclusion ………………………………………………………………………………………54
References ……………………………………………………………………………………….56
LIST OF TABLES
Table 4.1: Unit Root on Variables and Residuals of all the Regressions..……44
Table 4.2: Co-integration Results ……………………………………………………….45
Table 4.3: OLS Results on the Impact of ECA and Fuel Subsidy on Economic Growth…………47
Table 4.4: Garch Estimation on the Impact of Oil Revenue on the Nigerian Economic Growth.50
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1.1: Oil and Non-oil Revenue Trend (#)…………………………..5
Figure 2.1: Solow growth model diagram…..………………………………..15
Figure 4.1: Normality Test for the estimation of Economic Growth and its Determinants ……46
Figure 4.2: Scatter-gram of Economic Growth and its Residual ……………4
APPENDICES
Appendix 1: Augmented Dickey Fuller Unit Results……………………………………. i
Appendix 2: Ordinary Least Square Results………………………………………. iv
Appendix 3: Garch Results………………………………………………………….. v
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
- Background of the Study
Every economy experiences destabilization at one point in time or another; often referred to as fluctuations. Keynes (1936) describes these fluctuations as the business cycle comprising of high and low economic activities in the economy. The period of high income, output and employment has been called the period of expansion, upswing or prosperity, and the period of low income, output and employment has been described as contraction, recession, downswing or depression. At times, the economy finds itself in the grip of recession when levels of national income, output and employment are far below their full potential levels. A noteworthy feature about these fluctuations in economic activity is that they are recurrent and have been occurring periodically in a more or less regular fashion. Fluctuations in economic activity create a lot of uncertainty in the economy which causes anxiety to the individuals about their future income and employment opportunities and involve a great risk for long-run investment projects (Ahuja, 2012).
This fluctuation is common in the oil market where prices are determined by external forces and this goes a long way to hinder developmental activities. Owing to the fact that revenue is a function of price, any shock in the oil prices will be transmitted on the oil revenue. Prior to recent economic reforms, Nigeria’s history of oil revenue management had generally been poor (Okogu & Osafo-Kwaako, 2008). This is premised on the fact that managing oil wealth has proven to be a difficult challenge for many countries across the world, and this is evident in Ecuador, Mexico, Nigeria, and Venezuela. In Nigeria, oil revenues have led to huge investments in capital and infrastructure in the 1970s and 1980s but productivity declined and per capita GDP remained at about the same level as 1965. In other words, accumulated oil wealth over a 35 year period of some $350 billion did not raise the standard of living but worsened the distribution of income in Nigeria. Studies show that not only Dutch disease but more importantly waste of capital resources through bad investments and corruption have resulted in this predicament of oil revenue management (Budina, Pang & van Wijnbergen, 2007).
The paradox is that despite the huge resources from oil, Nigeria is still characterized by increasing threats of hunger and poverty. For instance, about 51.6 per cent of the population was living below one dollar (US$1.00) per day as at 2004; and by 2010, the percentage had increased with 61.2 per cent of the population living below US$1.25 per day, coupled with rising youth unemployment and high food prices (NBS, 2010). Consequently, the incomes of most families are not adequate for the basic sustenance of life.
Oil revenue which is the income earned from the sale of crude oil (Ogbonna & Ebimobowei, 2012) plays a key role in Nigerian economy. According to Budina and van Wijnbergen (2008), oil is the dominant source of government revenue, accounting for about 90 percent of total exports, and this approximates to 80% of total government revenues. The problem of low economic performance in Nigeria in recent years has been attributed not only to the failure of government to productively utilize the financial windfall from the export of crude oil particularly from the mid – 1970s, but also due to the frequent fluctuations of prices in the crude oil market. The oil boom of the 1970s led to the neglect of non-oil tax revenues, expansion of the public sector, and deterioration in financial discipline and accountability. In turn, oil-dependence exposed Nigeria to oil price volatility which threw the country’s public finance into disarray (Yakub, 2008).
The government of an oil-exporting country is confronted with significant uncertainty relating to its export earnings and fiscal revenues. Supply and demand in the oil market are both highly inelastic in the short run, with the result that even small shocks can have large effects on price. The unpredictability regarding oil revenues, which stems from uncertainties about such issues as the future trend in oil prices, the size of the oil reserves, and the cost of extraction is problematic for both short-run and long-run management of the economy (Rewane, 2007).
Fiscal policy involves the use of government spending, taxation and borrowing to influence the pattern of economic activities and also the level and growth of aggregate demand, output and employment (Ebimobowei, 2010; Abata, Kehinde, & Bolarinwa, 2012). Fiscal policy entails government’s management of the economy through the manipulation of its income and spending power of government to achieve certain desired macroeconomic objectives (goals) amongst which is economic growth (Medee & Nembee, 2011).
Jhingan (2004), Musgrave and Musgrave (2004), Oner (2002), and Hottz-Eakin, et al. (2009) viewed fiscal policy as mostly to achieve macroeconomic policy; it is to reconcile the changes which government modifies in taxation and expenditure programmes, or to regulate the full employment price and total demand to be used through instruments such as government expenditures, taxation and debt management. Typically, the objective of fiscal policy is directed towards maintaining sound public finances. This invariably amounts to an unwavering commitment to the maintenance of balanced budget by restricting aggregate spending to the size of aggregate recurrent revenue, and a sound public sector balance sheet is by implication achieved (Valmont, 2006; Osuka & Ogbonna, 2010; Jhingan, 2004).
Amongst the fiscal policy responses in relation to oil price/revenue in Nigeria have been the excess crude and the fuel subsidy program. Excess crude refers to the profit obtained when the price per barrel of crude oil exceeds the revenue estimate per barrel made in the budget at the time of its approval. When this occurs, the surplus profits are held in a separate fund called the Excess Crude Account (ECA) established in 2004. These profits are intended to boost the country’s revenue when oil prices are low. For instance, the 2006 robust global growth and high oil prices resulted in the excess crude account holding $20 billion. When the global financial crises hit in 2008, causing global demand for oil to drop and prices to fall from $147 per barrel in early 2008 to $35 per barrel in 2009, the country was spared from debilitating budget deficits by savings from the ECA. These spare funds helped stabilize the economy against the negative shock before oil prices rebounded after the 2009 downturn (Soneye, 2012).
The fuel subsidy program is another fiscal policy response to oil price fluctuation in Nigeria and other oil producing countries. Many countries have attempted to reform their fossil-fuel subsidies with varying degrees of success. The motivations behind these reforms can include a desire to reduce fiscal expenditures, improve energy efficiency or to reduce urban air pollution and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However if poorly planned and executed, the removal of subsidies can cause adverse economic, social or environmental repercussions as a result of higher energy prices. Governments that implement subsidy reform badly will pay a high political price. (Laan, Beaton & Presta, 2010).
A subsidy is defined here as any government policy that lowers end-user prices or transfers cash to producers, reduces their cost of operations, bears risk or increases their returns. Consumer subsidies for fossil fuels typically stimulate fuel consumption by industry or the public. Producer subsidies promote domestic exploration, extraction or refining (Laan,et al., 2010). The available literatures on fuel subsidy shows that there is no comprehensive and accurate account of the origin of fuel subsidy as the authors have different opinions regarding the concept of fuel subsidy in Nigeria. Notwithstanding, the researcher has drawn a conclusion from the available literatures regarding the concept of fuel subsidy in Nigeria. The fuel subsidy payment was introduced as a policy into Nigeria in 1973. Under International Monetary Fund (IMF)/World Bank instigation, petroleum subsidy in Nigeria has been stated by the government as the difference between the product domestic price and the export price which said to have started in 1973 with a subsidy of 33.7 percent, when the federal government fixed retail prices of domestic oil consumption at $1.9/bbl (Anyanwu, 1993). Something of a creeping phenomenon, the value of the subsidies has gone from 1 billion in the 1980s to an estimated 6 billion Dollars in 2011. In this period, the specific products targeted for subsidy have changed. Diesel oil has had its associated subsidy redaction while petrol (Gasoline), kerosene (DPK) continues to enjoy a 54.4 % subsidy over the international spot market price at the Nigerian pump (Centre for Public Policy Alternatives [CPPA], 2012).
An important objective of fiscal policy is to promote economic conditions conducive to business growth while ensuring that any of such government actions are consistent with economic stability (Anyanwu, 1993). Given the central importance of the latter, the key objective of fiscal policy in addition to guaranteeing sound public finances is to promote equity in taxation without creating economic distortions or disincentives to wealth creation (Valmont, 2006). Fiscal policy is generally meant to maintain full employment and stabilize growth with its primary tools being government expenditure and taxation or subsidy. For the sake of this study, the major fiscal policy responses to oil price fluctuation will be the excess crude account and fuel subsidy policies, while the overall fiscal effort to stabilize oil price will also be examined.
1.2 Statement of the Problem
