RESERVOIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND CHARACTERIZATION OF SANDSTONE UNITS IN AFIKPO AREA, SOUTHEASTERN NIGERIA

0
588

ABSTRACT

Reservoir quality assessment and characterization of sandstone units was carried out across the Afikpo area of the Southern Benue Trough. The study involved field investigations and laboratory studies/analyses. Field samples were subjected to Grain Size Analysis (GSA), Sand Equivalent test and Methylene Blue test. Studies revealed that the sandstones are friable, cross-bedded and show coarsening upward motif. Results from lithofacies analysis indicate seven (7) lithofacies deposited in a low to high energy environment. They are (1) Dark Gray Shale facies (Micaceous Dark Gray Shale Facies and Fossiliferous Dark Gray Shale Facies), (2) Bioturbated Sandstone Facies, (3) Wave Rippled Sandstone Facies, (4) Cross Stratified Sandstone Facies, (5) Horizontal/Laminated Sandstone Facies (6) Heterolithic Sandstone Facies, and (7) Pebbly/Conglomeritic Sandstone Facies. The Micaceous Dark Gray Shale Facies belongs to the Eze-Aku Group while other liithofacies are of the Nkporo Group. Granulometric analysis of sand samples indicates sediments that are poorly to well sorted, generally positively to very positively skewed and mesokurtic to leptokurtic. Results from bivariate plots indicates river sand deposition while multivariate plots indicate the sediments are fluvial and deposited in a shallow marine environment. Out of 18 locations sampled, 13 locations had Sand Equivalent values ranging between 90% – 99%, 4 locations had values between 80% – 89% and one location had 77%. These results indicate that a high number of the samples contained little clay because the higher the Sand Equivalent values, the cleaner the sands. The Methylene BlueF test revealed that the clays contained in the samples are not susceptible to moisture (do not swell) as they had Methylene BlueF values ranges of 1.7g/kg and 3.3g/kg. These values do not exceed the Methylene BlueF limit which is 10g/kg. Permeability results range from 35.07mD to 4112.56mD indicating moderate to excellent reservoir while porosity values indicate poor to good with value range of 7.0 – 15.7%. Regression analyses showed a good correlation between porosity and permeability with R2 (coefficient of correlation) being 74.6%. There was a weak correlation between Sand Equivalent and Methylene BlueF Tests with R2 being 39.5%. Thus, combining results derived from the various analyses, sandstones within the study area possess good reservoir qualities especially to house gas hydrocarbon.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title Page                                                                                                     I

Approval Page                                                                                                   II

Dedication                                                                                                       III

Acknowledgement                                                                                      IV

Abstract                                                                                                            V

Table of Contents                                                                                        VI

List of Figures                                                                                              X

List of Tables                                                                                                       XIII

CHAPTER ONE:     INTRODUCTION                                                             1

1.1       Background Information                                                                      1

1.2       Location and Accessibility of the Study Area                              3

1.3       Study Objectives                                                                                        3

1.4       Scope and Methodology                                                                              5

            1.4.1    Preliminary Study                                                                     5

            1.4.2    Detailed Mapping                                                            6

            1.4.3    Laboratory Analyses                                                             6

1.5       Literature Review                                                                                 7

CHAPTER TWO: GEOLOGICAL SETTING                                                9

2.1       Regional Geographic Setting                                                                     9

            2.1.1    Topography                                                                    9

            2.1.2    Drainage                                                                                        9

            2.1.3    Climate                                                                                      13

            2.1.4    Vegetation                                                                                   18

2.2       Regional Stratigraphic Setting                                                               21

            2.2.1    Tectonic Setting                                                                         21

            2.2.2    Stratigraphic Setting                                                                 24

CHAPTER THREE: FACIES DESCRIPTION                                          29

3.1       Rock Facies                                                                                                29

3.2       Dark Gray Shale Facies                                                                           33

3.2.1    Micaceous Dark Gray Shale Facies                                               33

3.2.1.1             Interpretation                                                       35

3.2.2    Fossiliferous Dark Gray Shale Facies                                        35

3.2.2.1             Interpretation                                                     35

3.3       Bioturbated Sandstone Facies                                                                    36

            3.3.1    Interpretation                                                                              36

3.4       Wave Rippled Sandstone Facies                                                                36

            3.4.1    Interpretation                                                                                   39

3.5       Trough Cross Stratified Sandstone Facies                                                39

            3.5.1    Interpretation                                                             39

3.6       Herring-bone Cross Stratified Sandstone Facies                                    39

3.6.1    Interpretation                                                                                                  41

3.7       Tabular Cross Stratified Sandstone Facies                                41

            3.7.1    Interpretation                                                                 41

3.8       Horizontal/Laminated Sandstone Facies                             41

3.8.1    Interpretation                                                                                                  41

3.9       Heterolithic Facies                                                                       41

3.9.1    Interpretation                                                                                                  45

3.10     Pebbly/Conglomeritic Sandstone Facies                                     45

3.10.1  Interpretation                                                                                                  45

3.11     Lithofacies Correlation                                                                 64

3.12     Lithofacies Association                                                        66

3.13     Depositional Model                                                               68

CHAPTER FOUR: SEDIMENTOLOGICAL ANALYSIS                             69

4.1       Introduction                                                                                     69

4.2       To prepare Methylene Blue                                                             70

4.3       Laboratory Tests                                                                                     70

            4.3.1    Samples Tested                                                                        70

            4.3.2    Sand Equivalent Test                                                               70

        4.3.2.1             Sand Equivalent Test Apparatus                            70

                        4.3.2.2             Procedure                                                               72

                        4.3.2.3             Calculations                                                                 74

                        4.3.2.4             Precautions                                                      74

            4.3.3    Methylene Blue Test (Clay Index Test)                                         75

                        4.3.3.1             Apparatus                                                           76

                        4.3.3.2             Procedure                                                          76

                        4.3.3.3             Precautions                                                          78

4.4       Sieve Analysis                                                                               82

4.4.1    Procedure                                                                                                        82

CHAPTER FIVE: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION                      88

5.1       Results from Sand EquivalentMB Test                                                    88

5.2       Results from Methylene Blue Test                                              94

5.3       Correlation between the Sand Equivalent and Methylene Blue values        94

5.4       Results from Sieve Analysis                                           101

5.4.1    Univariete Plots                                                                                              101

5.4.2    Bivariate Plots                                                                                                 101

5.4.3    Multivariate Plots                                                                  101

5.5       Estimating Permeability Based on Grain Size                               107

5.5.1    Krumbein and Monk’s Equation                                                 109

5.5.2    Granular Parameter                                                            109

5.6       Porosity Determination                                                                111

5.7       Regression Analysis                                                                 115

5.8       Integrating Analyses Carried Out to Assess and Characterize the Sandstone Units within the Study Area                                    115

CHAPTER SIX: SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION                             118

REFERENCES                                                                                                 120

APPENDIX                                                                                                       124

LIST OF FIGURES

Fig. 1: Map of Nigeria Showing the Study Area (Modified from Google earth 2013)         2

Fig. 2: Accessibility Map of the Study Area                                         4

Fig. 3: Topographic Map and Cross-section of the Study Area               10

Fig. 4: Elevation Maps of the Study Area                                                   11

Fig. 5: Drainage Map of the Study Area                                                  12

Fig. 6: Eastern States of Nigeria: Climatic Regions                                      14

Fig. 7: Eastern States of Nigeria: Rainfall                                                16

Fig. 8: Eastern States of Nigeria: Relative Humidity                                          17

Fig. 9: Eastern states of Nigeria: Mean Annual Temperature        19

Fig. 10: Eastern States of Nigeria: Vegetation Types                                  20

Fig. 11: Tectonic Map of Southeastern Nigeria from Albian to Lower Santonian                 23

Fig. 12: Tectonic Map of Southeastern Nigeria during the Campanian to Eocene                26

Fig. 13: Geologic Map of Southern Nigeria Showing the Study Area        27

Fig. 14: Outcrop Map of the Study Area                                               30

Fig. 15: Dark Gray Shale Facies                                                                       34

Fig. 16: Bioturbated Sandstone Facies                                                         37

Fig. 17: Wave Rippled Sandstone Facies                                                     40

Fig. 18: Cross Stratified Sandstone Facies                                         42

Fig. 19: Horizontal/Laminated Sandstone Facies                             43

Fig. 20: Heterolithic Facies                                                            44

Fig. 21: Channels                                                                           47

Fig. 22: Lithofacies Map of the Study Area                                 48

Fig. 23: Patterns and symbols used on graphic sedimentary logs in this work.   49

Fig. 24: Graphic Sedimentary Log of Location UI/01                            50

Fig. 25: Graphic Sedimentary Log of Location UI/02                                    50

Fig. 26: Graphic Sedimentary Log of Location UI/03                           51

Fig. 27: Graphic Sedimentary Log of Location UI/04                                     51

Fig. 28: Graphic Sedimentary Log of Location UI/05                 52

Fig. 29: Graphic Sedimentary Log of Location UI/06         52

Fig. 30: Graphic Sedimentary Log of Location UI/07                  53

Fig. 31: Graphic Sedimentary Log of Location UI/08                        53

Fig. 32: Graphic Sedimentary Log of Location UI/10                     54

Fig. 33: Graphic Sedimentary Log of Location UI/11                   54

Fig. 34: Graphic Sedimentary Log of Location UI/12                              55

Fig. 35: Graphic Sedimentary Log of Location UI/13                          55

Fig. 36: Graphic Sedimentary Log of Location UI/14                               56

Fig. 37: Graphic Sedimentary Log of Location UI/15                        56

Fig. 38: Graphic Sedimentary Log of Location UI/16               57

Fig. 39: Graphic Sedimentary Log of Location UI/18               57

Fig. 40: Graphic Sedimentary Log of Location UI/19           58

Fig. 41: Graphic Sedimentary Log of Location UI/20                  58

Fig. 42: Graphic Sedimentary Log of Location UI/21                    59

Fig. 43: Graphic Sedimentary Log of Location UI/22                       59

Fig. 44: Graphic Sedimentary Log of Location UI/23         60

Fig. 45: Graphic Sedimentary Log of Location UI/24                        61

Fig. 46: Graphic Sedimentary Log of Location UI/25                         62

Fig. 47: Statigraphic Correlation Panel of the Study Area                              65

Fig. 48: (a) Sand Equivalent Test Apparatus                                      71

(b) Samples for Sand Equivalent Test (120g of Sieve Samples Passing  the 0/2mm Fraction). 71

Fig. 49: Sand Equivalent Test Experiment                                                  73

Fig. 50: Sand Equivalent Test Experiment                                     74

Fig. 51: (a) Methylene Blue Test Apparatus                                      77

 (b) Samples for Methylene Blue Test (30g of Sieve Samples Passing the 0/0.125mm Fraction).                                                                                      77

Fig. 52: Methylene Blue Test Experiment                                              79

Fig. 53: Methylene Blue Test Experiment                                            80

Fig. 54: Spot Tests for End-point of Methylene Blue                               81

Fig. 55: Cumulative Curve of Location UI/03                                           83

Fig. 56: Cumulative Curve of Location UI/06                83

Fig. 57: Cumulative Curve of Location UI/07                                    84

Fig. 58: Cumulative Curve of Location UI/08                                        84

Fig. 59: Cumulative Curve of Location UI/13                                 85

Fig. 60: Cumulative Curve of Location UI/16                              85

Fig. 61: Cumulative Curve of Location UI/17                               86

Fig. 62: Cumulative Curve of Location UI/18                            86

Fig. 63: Cumulative Curve of Location UI/19                                      87

Fig. 64: Cumulative Curve of Location UI/20                                             87

Fig. 65: Control Scheme Diagram                                                89

Fig. 66: Plot of Sand Equivalent and Methylene Blue Results        99

Fig. 67: Column Chart Showing the Distribution of Mean, Sorting, Skewness and Kurtosis                                                  105

 Fig. 68: (a) Plots of Mean Diameter Against Deviation (Sorting)              106

               (b) Plots of Skewness Against Standard Deviation (Sorting)  106

Fig. 69: Effect of Grain Size on Permeability and Porosity        112

Fig. 70: Linear Plots of (a) Permeability (mD) against Porosity (%) 116

(b) Sand Equivalent Test (%) against Methylene Blue Test (g/kg)    116

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1: Regional Stratigraphic Sequence of South Eastern part of Nigeria       28

Table 2: Outcrop locations and their details                                   31

Table 3: (a) Range of wavelength (L), height (H) and ripple index for wind, wave-formed and current ripples        38

(b)Ripple height (H), ripple length (L) and ripple index measurements 38

Table 4: Summary of the lithofacies and their characteristics within the study area              63

Table 5a: Sand Equivalent TestMB Result                                     90

5b: Sand Equivalent Test MB Result in Range                                  92

Table 6: Average values of the Sand Equivalent Test MB                               93

Table 7: Methylene Blue Test result                                                      95

Table 8: Average values of the Methylene Blue Test                       98

Table 9: Average values of the Sand Equivalent Test MB and Methylene Blue TestF            100

Table 10a: Measured percentiles from the cumulative frequency curve of the different locations                                                    102

10b: Interpretations using the measured percentiles from the cumulative frequency curve of the different locations                              102

Table 11: Summary of distribution of mean, sorting, skewness and kurtosis             104

Table 12: Discriminations between beach versus shallow marine, and shallow marine versus fluvial-deltaic environments                    108

Table 13a: Estimating permeability based on grain size           110

13b: Terms applied to permeability values                                110

Table 14a Estimating porosity using mean and permeability values   3

14b Terms applied to porosity values                                               113

Table 15: Calculated reservoir parameters of selected sandstone units in the study area      114

CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

1.1            BACKGROUND INFORMATION

The study area is located in the Southern Benue Trough (Fig. 1), between latitudes 5°49′N and 5°54′N, and longitudes 7°54′E and 8°00′E. Benue Trough is an intra-continental rift basin characterized by tectonic and magmatic activities that occurred during Cretaceous times. The Benue Trough was affected by Santonian tectonic activity which deformed the “Benue Trough” and inverted the main depocenter of the Abakaliki Trough and subsequently created the Anambra and Afikpo Basins to the north-west and south-east respectively (Murat, 1972; Benkhelil and Guiraud, 1980; Benkhelil, 2001). The Santonian tectonics differentiated the sedimentary successions into pre and post Santonian packages. The post-Santonian successions are Campanian – Maastrichtian in age (Reyment, 1965); they occur both in the Anambra and Afikpo Basins respectively. In the Afikpo Basin, the Campanian – Maastrichtian succession comprises the Nkporo, Mamu, Ajali and Nsukka Formations.

Sandstones within the Afikpo area occur as ridges which consist of sands that are occasionally pebbly with few heterolithic beds as well as a lot of clays/fines. These ridges form northeast-southwest-trending topographic prominences while the shales underlie the swales i.e. the depressed areas. The sandstone ridges are dry and often barren of vegetation, while the swales are swamps. The ridges show extensive and deep weathering and laterization, such that exposures of fresh rock are available only along new roadcuts, ditches/gullies, quarries and some stream channels. The ridges are asymmetrical, with their gentler, coarser flanks facing the southeast and east, while the steeper flanks face the west.

1.2            LOCATION AND ACCESSIBILITY OF THE STUDY AREA

The study area lies within the Afikpo Basin and covers about 44km2. It is limited by latitudes 5°49′N and 5°54′N, and longitudes 7°54′E and 8°00′E. The area is bounded in the north by Ibii and the Cross River which runs north-to-south direction on the eastern border and is the main drainage system in the area, south by Unwana and west by Edda and Amasiri villages. The locations studied are Ndibe, Edobi village, Mac Gregor, Mgbom, Ugwuagu, Ozizza, Ngodo, Kpoghirikpo and Akpughuru (Fig. 2).

Access to the study area is through a network of roads which are main, secondary and minor roads. Some of the access routes are untared which during the rainy season are essentially not motorable thereby making geological fieldworks difficult. Others are footpaths which connect most parts of the study area. Exposures in the southern part of the study area were accessed through the Afikpo-Unwana Road, those in the northeastern part were accessed through Ndibe Beach Road, those in the north through Ngodo Road and those in the northwestern part through Afikpo-Amasiri-Abakaliki Road.

1.3            AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

This research work is aimed at assessing the reservoir quality and characterizing the sandstone units in Afikpo area, Southeastern Nigeria. To achieve these aims, the following are the objectives:

              To assess the reservoir quality of the sandstone bodies within the research area by studying the porosity, permeability, quantity of clay present and type of clay.

              To interpret the depositional environment within the study area.

              To integrate all available data such as Grain Size Analysis, Sand Equivalent Test, Methylene Blue Test, Facies analysis, porosity and permeability, quantity and type of clay present to model reservoir architecture, connectivity and flow properties.

1.4            SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY

Systematic study of the area was carried out in three phases: preliminary studies of literature and materials to get acquainted with the study area and visits to outcrops, deskwork and field studies, and laboratory analyses.

1.4.1         PRELIMINARY STUDY

This is the first step for a good geological mapping and involved collection and evaluation of all existing data on the study area. Such data include geological data from archival records, maps, photographs, reports and publications. An understanding of the history and culture of the people also helped in facilitating the work. This preparatory task involved geological interpretation of air photos to help in delineating rock units, tectonic structures and morphological features which facilitated the planning and execution of the actual field activities and also access into the mapping area. With these data at hand, a preliminary study of the area was made from the 2nd to 4th October, 2012. Since the locations (outcrops) to be studied are sites on private land, a visit was first made to H.R.H Ezeogo John O. Ekuma Izuegu 1 of Amizu Autonomous Community, Afikpo and Chief Gabriel A. Agwo the Onikara of Amizu Autonomous Community, Afikpo to seek permission to enter the lands and study outcrops. With the consent of the council, the cultural code for the area was obeyed which included no permission to access certain sites and certainly not allowed the removal of samples without special permission. Also, there were no removals of samples in some sites in other not to destroy the features exposed for other geologists who may wish to visit the site.

Outcrops were located with the help of field guide/base map of the area, information from tipper drivers and other logistic arrangements were made for detailed mapping phase.

1.4.2         DETAILED MAPPING

This phase involved deskwork and field study. Detailed mapping and logging of the sections were carried out in four phases: from 10th to 14th October, 2012, 22nd to 29th October, 2012, 13th to 17th March, 2013 and lastly 31th July to 4th August, 2013. This was done to get the characteristics of the various lithologic units, physical and sedimentary structures, and other details necessary in this research. During these periods, samples were collected from locations and detailed examination of the lithostratigraphic profiles of the exposures. Series of equipment were used which include:

              Relevant topographical maps.

              Handheld Global Positioning System (GPS) model GPSmap 76CS x, which uses ultra high-frequency radio wave signals from satellite to trigonometrically derive positions to within a few metres laterally.

              The compass-clinometer was used to measure:

o               The orientation of geological planes and lineations with respect to north.

o               The angle of dip of geological features with respect to the horizontal.

o               It was also used together with topographic map to accurately determine outcrops.

              Field notebook.

              Field tape for measuring vertical and horizontal extents of outcrops.

              Geological hammer

              Masking tape.

              Sample bags.

              Digital camera for photographing of outcrops and important sedimentary structures.

1.4.3         LABORATORY ANALYSES

This involved processing the samples collected in other to extract necessary information from

them. Sand Equivalent test was used in determining the cleanliness of the sandstones from clay, Methylene Blue test was used to determine the swelling of the clay while granulometric analysis was useful in the analysis and interpretation of textural data. Results from these analyses were presented in form of tables, graphs, photographs, logs and figures.

1.5            LITERATURE REVIEW

The area of study is within some part of the Southern Benue Trough, Southeastern Nigeria. The Benue Trough of Nigeria, located in the West African Continental Margin is about 80-150km wide long, and extends in a NE-SW direction from the Niger Delta in the Gulf of Guinea to the Chad Basin in the interior of the West African Precambrian Shield. The rocks of the Southern Nigeria sedimentary basin are mostly Palaeogene rocks. The rocks comprise the Niger Delta, Benin Embayment (ex-Dahomey), Anambra Basin, Abakaliki Fold-Belt, Afikpo Syncline and the Calabar Flank.

Reyment (1965) undertook the first detailed study of the stratigraphy of the southern Nigerian sedimentary basin and he proposed many of the lithostratigraphic units in the region. He recorded some paleontological evidence that showed that the Turonian was well developed and enriched by lots of ammonite and other fauna.

Murat (1972) and Burke (1996) observed that the Southern Nigeria sedimentary basin followed the breakup of the South American and African continents in the Early Cretaceous. Various lines of geomorphologic, structural, stratigraphic and palaeontological evidence have been presented to support a rift model (King, 1950; Bullard et al., 1965; Reyment, 1969; Burke et al., 1971; Fairhead and Green, 1989; Benkhelil, 1989; Guiraud and Bellion, 1995).

Hoque (1977) described the Eze-Aku Formation as being dominantly texturally and compositionally immature and attributed this to the proximity of provenance to the deposition of the basin. He also described the second cycle of sandstone as texturally immature and compositionally mature and thus the Afikpo Sandstone as quartz arenite and Eze-Aku Formation as feldspathic arkose.

Nwajide (1979) and Arua (1986) suggested environments that ranged from nearshore (barrier ridge-lagoonal complex) to intertidal and subtidal zones of the shelf environments.

Petters (1980) believe that the Eze-Aku Formation and Awgu Formation are equivalent because they are indistinguishable in the field both in lithology and faunal assemblages.

Zaborski (1983) gave detailed description of the ammonite fauna from southern Nigeria. He assigned Campano-Maastricthian age to the Nkporo Shale and Eze-Aku as being Early Turonian in age.

Fayose and Ola (1990) suggested that the sediments were deposited in marine waters between the depths of 10m and 1000m.

CHAPTER TWO

GEOLOGICAL SETTING

2.1            REGIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SETTINGS

2.1.1         TOPOGRAPHY

Topography is the layout of natural and artificial features or cultural features on the surface of the earth, and the science of their detailed, graphic representations on maps and charts. From the topographic section of the study area and elevation map (Fig. 3 and 4), it is observed that the landscape is essentially irregular in nature and divided into three broad sections of plateau, undulating plains and valleys. This landform steadily rises from about 15.24m in the valleys to as high as above 152.4m in the Ozizza-Ngodo areas. The highest elevation was recorded in the Ozizza sandstone ridges with height of 177m. The sandstone ridges are rugged, occur in groups and extend for several kilometres and terminate at the banks of the Cross River. Behind the ridges are depressions of swampy almost flat surfaces which extend for several kilometres and used for rice plantation and other cash crops. Many of the depressions become flooded during the rains and as such destroy crops, but consist of heaps of sand in the dry season. The inaccessibility of some parts of the study area is attributed to the natural/physical features.

2.1.2         DRAINAGE

Structures and lithological differences have had significant influence on pattern and orientation of the drainage network within the study area. The drainage map (Fig. 5) exhibits the dendritic drainage pattern. This pattern resembles the shape of a tree, with the smallest tributaries being the outermost twigs and the main river channel forming the trunk. The area is dominated by the well navigable Cross River drainage system. Other rivers within the study area are Iyioka and Ubei Rivers. The Iyioka river is located in the southern part of the study area and marks a boundary between Afikpo town and Kpoghirikpo villages. The river has its head in the Afikpo 

Sandstone Ridge. Two lakes, Ehoma and Iyieke lakes were located in the south eastern region along the Cross River. Streams in the study area are Orra, Ndibe, Okwukwo, Uji and Amoncha all flowing in the south-east direction The Cross River which enters into the Atlantic Ocean forms a loop in the south-eastern edge of the study area.

The study area is made up of dry valleys, poor ground water resources, impervious rocks and numerous dry channels which contain water during the rains and dry up in the dry season. Owing to the impervious nature of the ground, streams are numerous, incised and flow in a general south-easterly direction into the Cross River. While the undulating plains boast of intermittent and ephemeral streams, there are perennial streams in the plateau region. In the plateau region, the valleys of the streams drain southwards into the Cross River. The upper courses of the streams originate from the head of the plateau gullies which flow over impervious shales and sandstones. The steep slopes in the region promote flash flooding and rapid run-offs into the streams.  The area experiences scarcity of water during the dry season.

2.1.3         CLIMATE

The study area falls within the fourth region in fig. 6. Climatic condition in this area is tropical and characterized by three air masses. The period from April to September is controlled by the warm wet tropical moisture air mass or south-westerly wind and forms the rainy season. The rains come mainly during this period and are marked as the planting season. This rain is usually of high intensity at the beginning of this season and comes with lightening, thunderstorms and hailstorms. These bring sudden and torrential down pours and run-offs accompanied by sheet erosion on the slopes. This south-westerly wind causes a lot of damage mostly in the plateau region, but ease off in the undulating plains. The wettest months are July and September. There is a break in August with double maxima of rainfall regime.  Warm tropical air mass or north-east trade winds attract the harmattan with low relative humidity from December to February.

During this period, the climate is cool and dusty; the mornings are always cool and misty while the afternoons are hazy. The period from February to March is hot (Ofomata, 1975).

The study area has four months in which precipitation is less than 60mm with the driest months having less than 28.75mm. The annual total, however, ranges from 1600mm to more than 2000mm with variations in rainfall regime (Fig. 7).

Relative humidity is high during the rainy season when humid maritime airmass is predominant and low during the dry season when dry continental airmass is predominant. Generally, the tropical continental airmass has a very low relative humidity. It affects the northern parts of the Eastern States in the dry season. From December to February when the study area is under the influence of this airmass, it has an average relative humidity of between 60% to 70% at 10.00hours before it begins to rise again (Monanu, 1975) (Fig. 8).

Temperature is an important aspect of climate and is similar throughout the study area. Due to its latitudinal location, the study area receives abundant and constant isolation. Because of this, atmospheric temperatures are continually high and only change slightly within the year. The mean daily maximum temperature is usually above 27°C all through the year. It is highest from February to April but does not usually exceed 35°C. In the mornings it is usually cold especially in the months of January and December. It is hottest, one or two hours in the afternoon. It is warm late in the afternoon and cold again at night. The nights are so cold that inversions of temperatures within some localities are common. Two periods of high temperature closely associated with the passage of the overhead sun are recorded within the year. These two periods are separated by two periods of low temperature. The hottest months of the year are February, March and April and they coincide roughly with the passage of the overhead sun. The second period of high temperature, also caused by the passage of the overhead sun, is unduly delayed by the heavy rainfall of September and October and so becomes prominent only in November. This period does not last long and as soon as the cold harmattan wind becomes dominant in December and January, it causes temperature to drop again. The coldest month is usually August. It is the middle of the rainy season and so the south west monsoon winds and the heavy rains of the preceding months cause lower atmospheric temperature. Also, in spite of the “little dry season” in August, there is still a high degree of cloudiness which deflects incoming solar radiation. The days are usually cloudy at this period although the nights may be clear (Ofomata, 1975). (Fig. 9).

2.1.4         VEGETATION

This section indicates the type of soil cover and the nature of the underlying geology, especially where there is natural alignment of the vegetation. The vegetation of the study area falls within the Lowland Rain Forest (Fig. 10) which extends almost fully across the Eastern States of Nigeria in a broad band 130 to 200km wide. Although most of this region has been reduced by human activity to a secondary plant cover-so much so that large parts of the rain forest zone may be termed an “oil palm bush”, from the iniquitousness of oil palms Elaeis quineensis-in protected reserves and in some uncultivated patches between crop farms. The forest is characterized by an abundance of plant species, sometimes exceeding 150 different species per hectare. With regard to the vertical arrangement of plant structures, a storeyed sequence of canopies was observed in most sections of the forest. On the forest floor are such herbaceous genera as Geophila and Costus. Plants of intermediate height (10-25m high) are represented by trees like Musanga Smithii and Albizzia Zygia, while at the highest levels (50-65m) occur the crowns of veritable forest giants: Khaya ivorensis, Chloropgora, Ceiba pentandra, and so forth. Complementing the forest physiognomy is a luxuriant growth of viniferous climbers, e.g. Ficus spp., and epiphytic accretions, e.g. Platycerium and  Nephrolepsis spp.  Along the stream borders are galaxy of forest, mainly bamboo trees while thick forests occur sparsely in the settled areas. The palm bush is prevalent in the virgin forests, but they are not uncommon around the ancestral shines. The dominant trees are those of the mahogany, iroko, cam wood, silk cotton, oil palm, coconut, native pea, wild mango, paw-paw and sweet orange.

In the undulating plains, the soils include acid sands and lateritic alluvial soil. The plateau region is made up of acid and lateritic soils with poorly developed and structurally unstable profiles, alluvial soils along such major rivers as the Iyioka and Ubei. About 60% of the areas of the undulating plains are suitable for the cultivation of tubers such as yams and cassava which are dominant. The low lands are suitable for the cultivation of the dominant cereal which is rice. Also, the region provides ideal conditions for such economic plants as the oil palm, cocoa, citrus, sugar cane, plantain, banana, coconut, cocoyam, pineapple and maize. Vegetables of all sorts grow well. There are extensive stretches of valleys with marshy dense growth of raffia palm trees. The sandstone ridges are marked by sparse vegetation (Ofomata, 1975).

RESERVOIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND CHARACTERIZATION OF SANDSTONE UNITS IN AFIKPO AREA, SOUTHEASTERN NIGERIA