RURAL-URBAN INTERDEPENDENCE ON FUEL WOOD IN ANAMBRA STATE, NIGERIA

0
76

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title Page —   —         —         —         —         —         —         —         —         —         —         i

Certification —                      —         —         —         —         —         —         —         —         ii

Dedication — —         —         —         —         —         —         —         —         —         —       iii

Acknowledgement —            —         —         —         —         —         —        iv

Table of Contents — —         —         —         —         —         —         —         —         —         v

List of Tables —        —         —         —         —         —         —         —         —         —      vii

List of Figures —       —         —         —         —         —         —         —         —         —     viii

Abstract —     —         —         —         —         —         —         —         —         —         —        ix

CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION      —         —         —         —         —         —         1

Background Information     –         —         —         —         —         —         1

Problem Statement   —             —         —         —         —         —         —         5

Objective of the Study        —         —         —         —         —         —         —         —         6

Research Hypotheses                  —         —         —         —         —         7     

Justification of the Study  —        —         —         —         —         —         —         7  

CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW    —         —         —         —         —         9

Definitions ofRural areas and Urban Areas       —         —         —         —         9

Peri-urban Interface–       —            —         —         —         —         —         —         13

Rural –urban differences and Linkages   —         —         —         —         —         16

Rural-urban Social Interdependence      —         —         —         —         —         17

Rural-urban Environmental Interdependence       —         —         —         19

Rural-urban Economic Interdependence —            —         —         —         21

Constrains of Rural-Urban Interdependence            —         —         —         25

Components of Rural-Urban Interdependence  —         —         —         —         27

Theoretical Framework            —             —     —         —         —         —         33

Analytical Framework             —                  —         —         —         —         —         34

CHAPTER THREE: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY           —         —         —         39

The Study Area         —         —         —         —         —        —         —         39

Sampling Procedure             —      —         —         —         —         —         39

Method of Data Collection —         —    —         —         —         —         —         41

Method of Data Analysis    —         —         —         —         —         —         41

Model Specification            —         —-         —         —         —         —         —         41 

Multiple Regression Model            —         —         —         —         —         —         41

Exploratory Factor Analysis               —         —         —         —         —         42

Probit Model —         —         —           —         —         —         —         43

CHAPTER FOUR: RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS   —         —         —         45

Socio-Economic Characteristics of the Respondents    —  —         —         45

Age of the Respondents      —         —         —         —                 —         —         45

Gender           —         —         —         —         —               —         —         —         46

Educational Qualification. —         —         —      —         —         —         —         46

Household Size.       —         —         —         —                —         —         —         47

Experience    —         —         —         —         —          —         —         —         —         48

Awareness of Importance of Forest Perceived by Respondents –   –  —     49

Socio-Economic Factors Influencing Income from Fuel wood —    –         52

Test of  Hypothesis 1.          —         —             —         —         —         55

Rural-Urban Interdependence in Terms of Flow of Forest Products 55          

Flow of Forest Related Benefits Between Rural and Urban Areas    57

Factor Constraints to Rural-Urban Flow of Fuel wood —        –         60

Socio-Economic Characteristics of the Respondents Influencing the Decisions to Invest in Forest Development   —           —         65

CHAPTER FIVE: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS –68

Summary       —     —         —         —         —         —         —         —         68

Conclusion    —         —         —         —         —         —         —         —         —         —         71

Recommendations   —         —               —         —         —         —         —         72

REFERENCES        —         —         —         —         —         —         —         —         —         74

Appendix A: Questionnaire          —         —         —         —         —         —         82

LIST OF TABLES

Table 3.1:  Summary of the Study Location & Sample Chosen — —         40

Table 4.1:  Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Respondents by Age     —         —         —         —         —         —         —         45

Table 4.2: Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Respondents by Gender                 —         —         —         —         46

Table 4.3: Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Respondents by Years of Education   — —         —         —         —         47

Table 4.4: Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Respondents by Household Population   —         —         —         —         48

Table 4.5: Frequency and Percentage Distribution of the Respondents by Years of Experience            —         —         —         —         49

Table 4.6: Awareness of the Importance of Forests  Perceived by the respondents —-      —         —         —         —         —         51

Table 4.7: Result of the Multiple Regression Analysis for  Socio-Economic Factors of the   Respondents Influencing their Income on Fuel wood     –  54

Table 4.8: Frequency and Percentage Description of Rural-Urban Interdependence in Terms of Flow of Fuel wood      —         —         —         57

Table 4.9: Frequency and Percentage Distribution of Flow of Forest Related Incentives between Rural and Urban Areas            —         —         58

Table 4.10: Varimax Rotated Factors / Constraints to Rural – Urban Flow of Fuel wood in the Study Area           —         —         —         —         64

Table 4.11: Probit Regression Analysis Result of Socio-economic Factors of the Respondents that Influence the Decision to Invest in Forest Development   – – – – – – 67

LIST OF FIGURE

Fig. 1: Rural–Urban Interdependence on Forest Benefits              —         59

Abstract

This study examined the rural-urban interdependence on fuel wood in Anambra State, Nigeria using cross-sectional data. The study used purposive and random sampling techniques for the selection of 120 gatherers that constituted respondents for the study. The study employed descriptive and relevant inferential statistics for data analysis. The findings of the study revealed that out of the 14 indicators of the importance of forest examined in the study, the respondents were aware of 11 as importance of forest to people in the study area. The linear regression analysis with an R2 of 0.702 showed that about 70% of the total variations in the income from fuel wood were caused by the specified independent variables in the model. On rural-urban interdependence on forest, (79%) of money and income related benefits flow from urban to rural areas; (88%) of benefits relating to innovative ideas on forestry management and conservation flow from urban to rural areas, about (68%) of forest related market information spread from urban areas to the people in rural areas while about (55%) of awareness of the importance of forest and its related products flow from the urban to rural. About (78%) of benefits in the form of forest related job opportunities spread from rural to urban areas. Using a factor loading of 0.30, the factors that constrain rural-urban flow of fuel wood in the area were:  socio-financial; infrastructural/institutional; and distributive factors. The result of the probit model with an R2 of 0.892 indicated that about (89%) of the total variations in the decision of the respondents to either invest in forest development or not were caused by the specified independent variables in the model. Based on the above findings, it was recommended that government should ensure the provision of good feeder and major road network between rural and urban areas in the state, that for smooth flow of fuel wood, marketing channels should be encouraged in order to hasten distribution of the fuel wood among others.

CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

  1. Background Information

Majority of Nigeria’s poor live in the rural areas and depend directly or indirectly on agriculture and its related activities while owning or controlling few physical productive assets (Amaechina and Eboh, 2006). In other words, the above statement shows that Agriculture (farming, forestry, fishing etc), in Nigeria, is practiced mostly by the poor in the rural areas. Consequently, it is from the rural areas that the products of forest such as fuel wood are shifted to the urban areas, where they are highly demanded. In return, the urban areas, offer some developmental services to the rural areas, and this cooperation creates multipronged linkages between the two areas. For instance, Garrett (2005), stated that rural and urban areas share many degrees of interactions; rural areas provide critical consumption goods for urban consumers, such as food, energy, low-cost land and labour, and unique experiences. Urban areas constitute the end market for rural production; provide professional services; offer diverse job opportunities; and generate resources for public and private investment in rural areas.

It is now widely recognized that there exists various forms of complementarities between the urban and the rural areas in every country. The various ways these two areas complement each other’s activities have created several linkages between them and these linkages have now been known as the rural-urban interdependence (Okpala, 2003).

 The rural-urban interdependence especially on fuel wood portrays the linkages that exist between the two areas by critically considering the importance of fuel wood and the roles they play in supporting lives as well as regional development. Fuel wood, otherwise called firewood is simply wood cut for fuel. It is renewable energy source usually obtained from forest (FAO, 2010). According to World Energy Council (1999) fuel wood is primarily for cooking which accounts for about 60 percent of endorsed energy consumption of households in developing countries. For instance, in low income countries, the consumption of fuel wood energy by households is typically ten times the total consumption of commercial energies for other purposes (Denis, 1987).

Arnold (1998), noted that fuel wood is gotten from the forest. Forest includes all resources that can produce forest products. Products like timber, fuel wood, charcoal, food, fruits, nuts, pharmaceutics, etc; and forest products services like watershed, erosion control and prevention, soil stabilization etc. Forest, which include all resources that can produce forest products, namely, woodland, scrubland, bush fallow, farm-bush, and trees on farms, as well as ecosystem dominated by trees, provide household with income, ensure food security, reduce the vulnerability of shocks and adversities and increase their well being (Arnold, 1998).

Heltberg and Bacon (2003) noted that fetching fuel wood from forest for sales provide considerable amount of employment to people to meet both economic and energy needs of households in rural and urban areas. It allows quick returns on investments and is often practiced in conjunction with agricultural activities.

Fuel wood represents a major item in the energy budget of the people of developing countries especially the rural communities (Akujor, 1988). For instance, about 40 percent of the rural population of Anambra state is involved in profitable gathering of fuel wood for sustainable livelihood in the state. (Anambra State Government, 2007). The environmental and economic importance of fuel wood for household energy source initiate rural-urban cooperation, which create various complementary activities that support regional development.         

The various complementarities existing between rural and urban areas give rise to the development of rural–urban linkage, and the new perspective referred to as the rural–urban linkage development approach, is increasingly becoming the accepted approach (Okpala, 2003). Rural-urban linkage generally refers to the growing flow of public and private capital, people (migration and commuting) and goods (trade) between urban and rural areas. It is important to add to these the flow of ideas, information and diffusion of innovation on the management of the forest for sustainable provision of the resources and durable services for the benefit of both the rural and urban areas.         

The issues included in the summary of UN-HABITAT (2003) resolutions, show that the old orthodoxy of a discrete and dichotomous approach to urban development as distinct from rural development no longer accords with reality, considering the complementary functions and flows of people, capital, goods and services, employment, information and technology between the two areas. This means that the consideration of rural development as completely distinct from urban development is no longer valid because it is now widely recognized that there exists an economic, social, and environmental interdependence between two areas. There is, therefore, the need for a balanced and mutually supportive approach to the development of the two areas. Also, there is a need to promote rural-urban linkage development approach, which posits urban and rural areas as the two ends of the human settlements continuum (Okpala, 2003). Thus, current discussion on the rural dimension of sustainable urban development should emphasize policies that are supportive of urbanization while addressing the challenge of increasing investment in the physical, economic and social infrastructure that are necessary to improve rural productivity and access to market (Tacoli, 1998).

Urban areas are created and further developed by the process of urbanization (Kubisch, 2007). As rapid urbanization of developing countries is inevitable, particularly amidst the phenomenon of globalization, the capital of cities and towns should be strengthened to enable them productively absorb excess rural population and to better manage urban development, while rural development should be based on policies that improve economic and social conditions of rural population and the need for the rural areas to contribute to  national economic growth through increased agricultural and non-agricultural productivity (Holland, 1991).

RURAL-URBAN INTERDEPENDENCE ON FUEL WOOD IN ANAMBRA STATE, NIGERIA