A study investigates the responses of students of English as a Second Language (ESL) to teachers’ written comments on essay drafts. Subjects were 15 students in intensive college ESL courses. The students wrote essay drafts, which were turned in to teachers for graded comments. The students were then interviewed within three days after receiving the graded final papers. Open-ended interviews focused on the changes students made in successive versions of their essays. Questions elicited an explanation of why each change was made, and how the student decided to make each change. Teacher comments (which could consist of implicit comments, explicit comments, direct corrections, or pointing out an error by underlining, etc). The focus of the comments (content, organization, lexicon, syntax, orthography, punctuation) and student changes (addition, deletion, rearrangement, substitution) were tabulated and analyzed. Results yielded three main conclusions: (1) students did read and use teachers’ comments to edit and expand compositions, but did not always understand the need for revision or substantially improve the compositions; (2) teacher comments did not do a good job of intervening in the writing process; and (3) comments often appropriated meaning and the students tolerated the appropriation. (MSE) * Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made * * from the original document. * RESPONDING TO OUR RESPONSE: STUDENT STRATEGIES FOR RESPONDING TO TEACHER WRITTEN COMMENTS Ruth Chapin and Marjorie Te:dal Portland State University “PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS MATERIAL HAS BED GRANTED BY Terdai TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC).” U CMPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Offic of Educational teeseetce end anofirallawat EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) Xfir document Oes been mproduCed as weld from the 0011011 Of oroerulahon oturnating C Minor changes have OW made to imams* reproduebon OueMy Points of mew or COMM* stated in the dacemant do not necessarily fecoasent official OEM posalon of policy AB STR ACT This article reports the results of a research project that investigated the responses of fifteen lower-intermediate ESL writing students to their teachers’ written comments on their essay drafts. It was found that the majority of comments focused on form rather than content or organization. The changes made by the students mirrored their teachers’ comments. Most of the changes were made as a result of direct corrections, which comprised more than half the comments. It is suggested that these written comments led students to edit or to expand their essays by adding details or explanation, rather than to revise by changing or developing meaning. Interviews with students revealed that they did not always understand the comments made by their teachers, even when they made the appropriate change. Students tended to make the changes suggested by their teachers even if those changes altered their intended meaning. It is proposed that requiring multiple drafts and providing strategies for developing meaning on early drafts is mote likely to help students revise than is focusing on grammatical problems ana directly correcting student writing.Â
PLACE YOUR ADVERT HERE
- ACCOUNTING PROJECT TOPICS AND MATERIALS3553
- EDUCATION PROJECT TOPICS AND MATERIALS3486
- ENGLISH AND LINGUISTIC PROJECT TOPICS AND MATERIALS2939
- COMPUTER SCIENCE PROJECT TOPICS AND MATERIALS FINAL YEAR1274
- BANKING AND FINANCE PROJECT TOPICS AND MATERIALS1250
- BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION PROJECT TOPICS AND MATERIALS1236
- EDUCATION FOUNDATION GUIDANCE AND COUNSELLING TOPICS AND MATERIALS1045
- ZOOLOGY PROJECT TOPICS AND MATERIALS1002
- MASS COMMUNICATION PROJECT TOPICS AND MATERIALS1001
- ANIMAL SCIENCE PROJECT TOPICS AND MATERIALS978
- LAW PROJECT TOPICS AND MATERIALS896
- ARTS EDUCATION PROJECT TOPICS AND MATERIALS844
- MARKETING PROJECT TOPICS AND MATERIALS690
- AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION PROJECT TOPICS AND MATERIALS676
- PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION PROJECT TOPICS AND MATERIALS654
LATEST PROJECTS
STUDIES ON SOME ASPECTS OF ANTHRACNOSE-BLIGHT-DIEBACK COMPLEX OF CULTIVARS OF GRAPEVINES (VITIS SPP.) IN...
GENETIC VARIABILITY STUDIES OF TWENTY POTATO GENOTYPES
RELATIONSHIP OF HAEMOGLOBIN AND POTASSIUM POLYMORPHISM WITH CONFORMATION, MILK PRODUCTION AND BLOOD BIOCHEMICAL PROFILES...
ADOPTION OF AGRICULTURAL INNOVATIONS AMONG MEMBERS AND NON-MEMBERS OF WOMEN CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES IN OJU...
SMALL FARMER CREDIT WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO NIGERIA
DISCLAIMER
All undertaking works, records and reports posted on this website, modishproject.com are the property/copyright of their individual proprietors. They are for research reference/direction purposes and the works are publicly supported. Do not present another person’s work as your own to maintain a strategic distance from counterfeiting its results. Use it as a guide and not to duplicate the work in exactly the same words (verbatim). modishproject.com is a vault of exploration works simply like academia.edu, researchgate.net, scribd.com, docsity.com, coursehero and numerous different stages where clients transfer works. The paid membership on modishproject.com is a method by which the site is kept up to help Open Education. In the event that you see your work posted here, and you need it to be eliminated/credited, it would be ideal if you call us on +2348053692035 or send us a mail along with the web address linked to the work, to [email protected]. We will answer to and honor each solicitation. Kindly note notification it might take up to 24 - 48 hours to handle your solicitation.